Skip to content
Use case 136

Electronic Health Record Workstations

A deployment concept for hospitals, clinics, health networks, clinicians and privacy teams.

Deployment concept · Suitability unverified
Healthcare and Life Sciences

Why this environment matters

Security for electronic health record workstations starts with the system's role: it gives clinicians and administrators access to diagnoses, notes, medications, orders and patient history. A key concern is that phishing, malicious attachments or overbroad sessions can expose sensitive records and enable fraudulent clinical changes. NØNOS offers a potential architecture based on signed capsules, explicit capabilities and strong isolation.

The security challenge

The practical concern is that phishing, malicious attachments or overbroad sessions can expose sensitive records and enable fraudulent clinical changes. Healthcare systems process deeply sensitive data while supporting time-critical clinical decisions. Security must improve trust without delaying care or obscuring the human responsibility for treatment. The attack surface may include remote support, software updates, removable media, third-party libraries, public input or misused operator credentials. The security design therefore needs containment as well as prevention.

How the capsule model could help

The proposed deployment pattern is to separate record viewing, document handling, prescribing and administrative tasks with role- and patient-context capabilities. NØNOS would use minimal sensitive persistence and attested privileged sessions as the trust foundation, then apply patient-context capabilities and signed clinical software around higher-risk functions. Logs or proofs could record which approved capsule performed a privileged action without retaining unnecessary user data.

Separate address spaces and capability checks can limit cross-process reach. They cannot stop harmful use of legitimate permissions, prove AI decisions correct or substitute for domain-specific safety controls.

Deployment requirements

Clinical deployment would require medical-device validation, patient-safety risk management, privacy review, human factors testing and integration with existing approved workflows. Security controls must never obstruct emergency care.

Current public-beta limitations, hardware support and application availability must be assessed before any pilot. Neither this use case nor an industry source establishes NONOS certification or a current customer deployment.

Who could buy or integrate it?

  • Hospital groups purchasing clinical workstation fleets
  • Electronic health record vendors integrating desktop clients
  • Healthcare IT providers managing shared care-delivery terminals

Industry examples: Epic, Oracle. These are research prospects, not represented as NONOS customers, partners or endorsers.

Opportunity research

Separate the market from the model.

Published industry benchmark
US$35.9 billion

Electronic health records

Global · 2025 · annual market estimate

EHR software subscriptions, licenses, resale and professional services across care settings.

Modelled global devices
3M–60M

Candidate OS endpoints

Hypothetical planning range · 2025

Low, hypothetical planning assumptions. Hardware eligibility, procurement and adoption remain unverified.

Illustrative annual licensing
$120M–$10.8B

USD / year at full model coverage

Device scenario × assumed US$40–$180 per device / year.

Not a revenue forecast, announced price or measured serviceable market.

Device calculation

Hypothetical global planning range, 2025 scenario: assume 100,000–400,000 hospitals, large clinics and integrated outpatient facilities × 30–150 candidate OS endpoints per site/asset = 3,000,000–60,000,000 endpoints. Counting unit: clinical EHR workstations, excluding personal staff phones. Site/asset counts and endpoint densities are author assumptions, not a measured installed base. Coverage is limited to the defined equipped subset; includes all candidate endpoints within that assumed subset. Hardware eligibility, certification, adoption and achievable NØNOS share are unverified; overlaps other cases.

Electronic Health Records Market Size Report, 2026-2033 ↗

Context only, inherited market research; not a device/site denominator. Original monetary-market scope and geography are preserved in benchmark. This source does not establish the assumed worldwide site count or endpoint density.

How to interpret the figures

Adjacent or broader commercial market benchmark; not the NØNOS OS market, licensable-device count or revenue forecast.

Modelled candidate endpoints × assumed annual USD per-endpoint price. Price is an author assumption, not a vendor quote. Full-range mathematical scenario only: not a revenue forecast or TAM; excludes adoption timing, procurement, certification, support costs, channel economics and attainable market share. Case totals overlap and must not be added.

Inherited research compiled 13 Sep 2026; publisher estimates, not independently audited.

Read the full methodology

Explore NONOS

Choose your
NONOS experience.

Discover the platform for your organisation or explore the software.

You can reopen this chooser from the footer at any time.