Skip to content
Fleet & group policy

Trust the policy.
Verify the chain of authority.

A proposed enterprise control plane for signed group policies, verifiable software admission and organisation-owned device management.

Proposed enterprise layer · Not a shipped fleet service
The management model

Central policy. Local enforcement.

Blockchain records commitments to approved policy. The device verifies those commitments and enforces permissions locally.

From organisation to endpoint.

Proposed architecture
Illustrative device network. Five proposed policy stages are listed alongside this canvas.Illustrative network · move to rotate
APPROVE · EPOCH 42
Organisation group: Finance / Tier 1. Policy epoch 42. Capsules and capability ceilings approved.
Online + valid: authorised policy active in this model.
The service must validate chain identity, finality and anti-rollback state; a reachable RPC is not by itself trustworthy.

Interactive design proposal only. No real devices or policies are changed. Full fleet management, recovery and blockchain integration remain engineering and validation work.

Policy authority

Organisations define device groups, trusted publishers, capability ceilings, expiry and rollout rings. High-impact changes require explicit administrator approval.

Protected distribution

Signed policy bundles, identities and device inventories remain in approved off-chain systems. The registry records hashes and version commitments.

Endpoint verification

A narrowly privileged management capsule checks signatures, group membership, chain identity, finality, freshness and rollback protection before applying policy.

What belongs where

Public proof. Private operations.

Data or decisionProposed locationReason
Policy hash, epoch, signer commitmentsChain registry / permissioned ledgerTamper-evident publication and ordering
Full policy, identities, secrets, inventoryProtected off-chain servicesPrivacy, data residency and controlled disclosure
Process admission and capability checksLocal device / kernel boundaryAvailability and low-latency enforcement
Detailed rollout receipts and logsApproved evidence storeReviewable operational evidence without public surveillance
Optional receipt-batch digestChain registryAnchor evidence integrity; do not expose raw telemetry
From group to device

A familiar policy workflow.
A verifiable history.

01

Enrol

Bind a device identity to an organisation and target group through an approved enrolment process.

02

Stage

Test a signed policy in a limited ring before a broader rollout.

03

Apply

Translate verified policy into approved capsule admission and locally enforced permissions.

04

Revoke & recover

Rotate keys, expire authority, quarantine affected workloads and execute tested recovery.

Why a ledger?

A shared registry can make policy publication, version changes and signer history independently inspectable across multiple parties.

It does not decide whether the policy is sensible, secure a stolen administrator key or prove a compromised device obeyed it.

A signed, centrally governed registry may be sufficient for some organisations. Chain choice, finality and governance should follow the trust model, not precede it.
Operational design

Plan for the difficult days.

Inspect the current policy interface ↗
Build what comes next

The next era needs
a stronger foundation.

Explore the technology. Evaluate a pilot. Discuss a partnership.

Start a conversation

Explore NONOS

Choose your
NONOS experience.

Discover the platform for your organisation or explore the software.

You can reopen this chooser from the footer at any time.