Skip to content
Use case 136

Electronic Health Record Workstations

A deployment concept for hospitals, clinics, health networks, clinicians and privacy teams.

Proposed deployment · Compatibility assessment required
Healthcare and Life Sciences

Why this environment matters

Security for electronic health record workstations starts with the system's role: it gives clinicians and administrators access to diagnoses, notes, medications, orders and patient history. A key concern is that phishing, malicious attachments or overbroad sessions can expose sensitive records and enable fraudulent clinical changes. NØNOS offers a potential architecture based on signed capsules, explicit capabilities and strong isolation.

The security challenge

The practical concern is that phishing, malicious attachments or overbroad sessions can expose sensitive records and enable fraudulent clinical changes. Healthcare systems process deeply sensitive data while supporting time-critical clinical decisions. Security must improve trust without delaying care or obscuring the human responsibility for treatment. The attack surface may include remote support, software updates, removable media, third-party libraries, public input or misused operator credentials. The security design therefore needs containment as well as prevention.

How the capsule model could help

The proposed deployment pattern is to separate record viewing, document handling, prescribing and administrative tasks with role- and patient-context capabilities. NØNOS would use minimal sensitive persistence and attested privileged sessions as the trust foundation, then apply patient-context capabilities and signed clinical software around higher-risk functions. Logs or proofs could record which approved capsule performed a privileged action without retaining unnecessary user data.

Separate address spaces and capability checks can limit cross-process reach. They cannot stop harmful use of legitimate permissions, prove AI decisions correct or substitute for domain-specific safety controls.

Deployment requirements

Clinical deployment would require medical-device validation, patient-safety risk management, privacy review, human factors testing and integration with existing approved workflows. Security controls must never obstruct emergency care.

Current public-beta limitations, hardware support and application availability must be assessed before any pilot. Neither this use case nor an industry source establishes NONOS certification or a current customer deployment.

Who could buy or integrate it?

  • Hospital groups purchasing clinical workstation fleets
  • Electronic health record vendors integrating desktop clients
  • Healthcare IT providers managing shared care-delivery terminals

Industry examples: Epic, Oracle. Organisations shown illustrate the industry. No NONOS customer, partner or endorsement relationship is implied.

Market opportunity

Market benchmarks and device scenarios.

Published industry benchmark
US$35.9 billion

Electronic health records

Global · 2025 · annual market estimate

EHR software subscriptions, licenses, resale and professional services across care settings.

Modelled global devices
3M–60M

Candidate OS endpoints

Hypothetical planning range · 2025

Low confidence: planning assumptions. Hardware compatibility, procurement and adoption have not been validated.

Illustrative annual licensing
$120M–$10.8B

USD / year at full model coverage

Device scenario × assumed US$40–$180 per device / year.

Not a revenue forecast, announced price or measured serviceable market.

Device calculation

Hypothetical global planning range, 2025 scenario: assume 100,000–400,000 hospitals, large clinics and integrated outpatient facilities × 30–150 candidate OS endpoints per site/asset = 3,000,000–60,000,000 endpoints. Counting unit: clinical EHR workstations, excluding personal staff phones. Site and asset counts, and devices per site, are planning assumptions. The installed base has not been measured. Coverage is limited to the defined equipped subset; includes all candidate endpoints within that assumed subset. Hardware eligibility, certification, adoption and achievable NØNOS share are unverified; overlaps other cases.

Electronic Health Records Market Size Report, 2026-2033 ↗

Market context only; separate from device and site population estimates. Original monetary-market scope and geography are preserved in benchmark. This source does not establish the assumed worldwide site count or endpoint density.

How to interpret the figures

Adjacent or broader commercial market benchmark; not the NØNOS OS market, licensable-device count or revenue forecast.

Modelled candidate endpoints multiplied by an assumed annual USD price per endpoint. Pricing is a planning assumption, not a vendor quote. This illustrates the full scenario range, not revenue or total addressable market. It excludes adoption timing, procurement, certification, support costs, channel economics and achievable market share. Use cases can overlap, so their totals do not represent unique devices.

Research from 2026. Publisher estimates have not been independently audited.

Read the full methodology

Explore NONOS

Choose your
NONOS experience.

Discover the platform for your organisation or explore the software.

You can reopen this chooser from the footer at any time.