Skip to content
Use case 075

Carbon Capture Monitoring Systems

A deployment concept for carbon capture operators, emitters, regulators and environmental assurance teams.

Proposed deployment · Compatibility assessment required
Energy, Utilities and Resources

Why this environment matters

Security for carbon capture monitoring systems extends beyond passwords and network firewalls. The system tracks capture rates, compressor performance, pipeline conditions and stored carbon dioxide, while false measurements can hide leakage, misstate emissions reductions or drive unsafe pressure decisions. NØNOS could be evaluated as an execution layer that verifies software identity, limits device access and avoids unnecessary long-lived state.

The security challenge

Energy and resource systems combine high-energy equipment, geographically distributed assets and operational technology that cannot be patched or restarted like an ordinary office computer. For this system, the primary attack path is that false measurements can hide leakage, misstate emissions reductions or drive unsafe pressure decisions. Conventional general-purpose hosts often place parsers, management tools, network services and privileged drivers in one broad trust domain, allowing a flaw in a low-value feature to reach a high-consequence function.

How the capsule model could help

NØNOS could be placed at the operator, gateway, edge or application-compute layer and configured to authenticate sensor paths, isolate reporting from control, and preserve verifiable evidence from capture through transport and storage. The most relevant controls are a verified boot chain, signed control capsules, zone-specific capabilities and isolated remote maintenance. This would make privileges explicit: a service that reads a sensor, displays data or contacts a cloud API would not automatically be able to issue a physical command or use a signing key.

Separate address spaces and capability checks can limit cross-process reach. They cannot stop harmful use of legitimate permissions, prove AI decisions correct or substitute for domain-specific safety controls.

Deployment requirements

Deployment would require site-specific engineering, segregation from independent protection systems, deterministic performance testing, change control and compliance review. NØNOS would not replace certified relays or safety systems by default.

Current public-beta limitations, hardware support and application availability must be assessed before any pilot. Neither this use case nor an industry source establishes NONOS certification or a current customer deployment.

Who could buy or integrate it?

  • Carbon capture operators procuring monitoring and reporting infrastructure
  • CO2 transport and storage providers integrating custody and operational evidence
  • Capture technology suppliers embedding monitoring in industrial packages

Industry examples: Northern Lights, SLB Capturi. Organisations shown illustrate the industry. No NONOS customer, partner or endorsement relationship is implied.

Market opportunity

Market benchmarks and device scenarios.

Published industry benchmark
US$3.9 billion

Carbon capture and storage

Global · 2025 · annual market estimate

Capture and storage market across capture technologies and industrial applications; monitoring systems are not separately valued.

Modelled global devices
250–10K

Candidate OS endpoints

Hypothetical planning range · 2025

Low confidence: planning assumptions. Hardware compatibility, procurement and adoption have not been validated.

Illustrative annual licensing
$25K–$5M

USD / year at full model coverage

Device scenario × assumed US$100–$500 per device / year.

Not a revenue forecast, announced price or measured serviceable market.

Device calculation

Hypothetical global planning range, 2025 scenario: assume 50–500 operational and pilot carbon-capture facilities considered in the scenario × 5–20 candidate OS endpoints per site/asset = 250–10,000 endpoints. Counting unit: capture process, measurement and verification computers. Site and asset counts, and devices per site, are planning assumptions. The installed base has not been measured. Coverage is limited to the defined equipped subset; includes all candidate endpoints within that assumed subset. Hardware eligibility, certification, adoption and achievable NØNOS share are unverified; overlaps other cases.

Carbon Capture & Storage Market Size Report, 2026-2033 ↗

Market context only; separate from device and site population estimates. Original monetary-market scope and geography are preserved in benchmark. This source does not establish the assumed worldwide site count or endpoint density.

How to interpret the figures

Adjacent or broader commercial market benchmark; not the NØNOS OS market, licensable-device count or revenue forecast.

Modelled candidate endpoints multiplied by an assumed annual USD price per endpoint. Pricing is a planning assumption, not a vendor quote. This illustrates the full scenario range, not revenue or total addressable market. It excludes adoption timing, procurement, certification, support costs, channel economics and achievable market share. Use cases can overlap, so their totals do not represent unique devices.

Research from 2026. Publisher estimates have not been independently audited.

Read the full methodology

Explore NONOS

Choose your
NONOS experience.

Discover the platform for your organisation or explore the software.

You can reopen this chooser from the footer at any time.